Case 2306157/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. W. Clark v Real Places Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306157/2023
- Decision date
- 24 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. W. Clark
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant's complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. The complaint concerned the Respondent's failure to comply with the requirements of section 188 of that Act.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay remuneration by way of a protective award under section 189(3) for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 4 October 2023, the date on which the dismissal to which the complaint related took effect. The judgment states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply to the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment upheld a complaint under section 189 TULR(C)A for failure to comply with section 188 TULR(C)A and made a protective award for 90 days, but did not state a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 189 TULR(C)A 1992
- section 188 TULR(C)A 1992
- section 189(3) TULR(C)A 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.