Case 2306193/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Garay v Julián Andrés Ramírez Taborda — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306193/2023
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Garay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claim was issued in London South Employment Tribunals on 7 November 2023 and that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant GBP 479.66 gross, with the claimant responsible for accounting to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of payments received under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £480
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.