Case 2306200/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Vidroi v Marks and Spencer plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306200/2023
- Decision date
- 24 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Vidroi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Croydon by video on 24 May 2024 before Employment Judge Robinson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the claimant brought claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, identified as unpaid wages and holiday pay.
The tribunal held that both heads of claim failed. The written record states that the claim for unpaid wages was dismissed and that the holiday pay claim was also dismissed. No monetary award was made.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard tribunal note on post-hearing reasons.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, described as unpaid wages, failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant’s holiday pay claim failed and was dismissed as part of the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.