Case 2306202/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Dowrich v London General Transport Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306202/2023
- Decision date
- 22 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith
- Panel members
- Ms Khawaja, Mrs Goldthorpe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Dowrich
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Croydon by CVP on 21 and 22 October 2024 before Employment Judge Leith, sitting with Ms Khawaja and Mrs Goldthorpe. The claimant was represented for day one and approximately the first ten minutes of day two, with no attendance or representation thereafter.
The written record states that the complaint of direct race discrimination failed and was dismissed. It also states that the complaint of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct race discrimination fails and is dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in this short record. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in this short record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.