Case 2306208/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Jade Burton v Simply Bridget Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306208/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jade Burton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in London South by video before Employment Judge Evans alone, found that Jade Burton’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It held that Simply Bridget Limited had made unauthorised deductions from her wages in the period 19 April to 22 September 2023 and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum deducted, £1,130.35, subject to tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 19 April to 22 September 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,130 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint in respect of holiday pay well-founded and held that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £365 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,495
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.