Case 2306210/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Rashid v Supercraft Limited Heard by video — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306210/2023
- Decision date
- 15 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Rashid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Corrigan, sitting alone by video on 11-12 November 2024, found that Mr I Rashid was constructively unfairly dismissed by Supercraft Limited. The tribunal awarded £16,837.12 in respect of that dismissal, comprising a basic award of £11,252.50 and a compensatory award of £5,584.62. The compensatory award included 5 weeks' net pay of £4,153.85, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and a 20% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code. Recoupment does not apply.
The tribunal further found the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages to be well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £8,893.70 (subject to tax and National Insurance), comprising £4,862.47 in unpaid wages and £4,031.23 in unpaid holiday pay. The wrongful dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The total sum ordered to be paid to the claimant is £25,730.82, subject to appropriate deductions. Written reasons were not provided unless requested within 14 days, so the tribunal's detailed reasoning is not set out in this record.
Claims and outcomes
12 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Tribunal found the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed. Award comprises basic award of £11,252.50 and compensatory award of £5,584.62 (including 5 weeks' net pay of £4,153.85, loss of statutory rights of £500, and 20% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code). | Upheld | — | £16,837 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded as constructive unfair dismissal; remedy captured under the constructive_dismissal claim entry to avoid double-counting. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint well-founded; £4,862.47 unpaid wages component of the £8,893.70 awarded under this head (subject to tax and NI deductions). | Upheld | — | £4,862 |
| Holiday pay | £4,031.23 unpaid holiday pay component of the £8,893.70 awarded alongside unpaid wages under the unlawful deduction head. | Upheld | — | £4,031 |
| Constructive dismissal | Tribunal found the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed. Award comprises basic award of £11,252.50 and compensatory award of £5,584.62 (including 5 weeks' net pay of £4,153.85, loss of statutory rights of £500, and 20% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code). |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,731
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,253
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,585
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.