Case 2306216/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nicholas Hedges v Ratcliff and Roper (Printers) Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306216/2023
- Decision date
- 1 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Nicholas Hedges
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the first respondent had not provided a response to the claim. Applying Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the Employment Judge entered judgment for the claimant on 1 March 2024.
The extracted judgment does not set out the individual legal heads of claim or any substantive findings on liability beyond the Rule 21 judgment. It also states that the position of the second respondent and the issue of remedy would be decided at the hearing listed for 18 March 2024, so no monetary award is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the first respondent provided no response and that, under Rule 21, judgment was entered for the claimant. The extracted text does not identify the individual heads of claim in the order, and it states that the position of the second respondent and the issue of remedy would be decided at the hearing on 18 March 2024. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.