Mr D Harris v F M Conway Limited — 2025

Case reference: 2306285/2023
Decision date: 23 January 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Harrington REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr D Harris

Respondent

F M Conway Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a hearing before Employment Judge Harrington, the claimant Mr D Harris applied to amend his claim to include a direct race discrimination claim. The tribunal allowed that amendment.

The claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested, and no monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The same hearing allowed the claimant's application to amend the claim to add direct race discrimination, but the merits of that claim were not determined in this judgment.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.