Case 2306288/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Ngimbi v Pride Media Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2306288/2020
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rea
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Ngimbi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Ngimbi brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages against Pride Media Ltd. The tribunal heard the matter in the claimant's absence; no one attended for the respondent, although the tribunal found the respondent had acknowledged the notice of hearing. The claimant gave oral evidence that the last deduction in the series related to salary for March 2020, due on or about 1 April 2020, and that no later sums were owed for notice or holiday pay.
Applying section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the approach in Taylorplan Services Ltd v Jackson & ors, the tribunal found that the claim was presented out of time. It held that the relevant three-month period ran from the last deduction, so the claimant needed to commence ACAS Early Conciliation by 30 June 2020. Instead, Early Conciliation was started on 19 August 2020, about seven weeks late. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had waited after receiving assurances from Mr Cushnie and had not known about the Early Conciliation requirement, but said lack of knowledge was not relevant to the not reasonably practicable test.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant's reasons, while understandable, did not show that it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint in time. It therefore did not go on to consider whether the claim had been brought within a further reasonable period. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and dismissed it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment is headed as a strike out judgment, but the decision section states that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claim was presented outside the three-month time limit in section 23(3) ERA 1996 and was therefore dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable test
- Taylorplan Services Ltd v Jackson & ors 1996 IRLR 184
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.