Case 2306302/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Mistry v O'Flinn Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306302/2023
- Decision date
- 19 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Mistry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 16 November 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Wright determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered O'Flinn Limited to pay Miss R Mistry £500.39, which was the only sum recorded in the judgment.
The judgment does not record any other heads of claim, any separate remedy breakdown, or any lay members. It records only the holiday entitlement award and the total amount payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £500.39. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.