Case 2306327/2020 · Employment Tribunal
M Johnson v Folkestone, St Martins Church Of England Primary School Kent County Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306327/2020
- Decision date
- 18 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Johnson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 July 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any determination of the substantive merits, any liability finding, or any remedy award. It records only the procedural strike-out decision and was approved by Employment Judge Andrews on 18 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that "the claim" was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the underlying claim type is taken from the case listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that "the claim" was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the underlying claim type is taken from the case listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that "the claim" was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the underlying claim type is taken from the case listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.