Case 2306328/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Vecci v Aisha Gilead — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306328/2023
- Decision date
- 16 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Vecci
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 18 November 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of 4 weeks' notice. Damages were calculated using the claimant's gross weekly wage of £337.00 multiplied by 4 weeks, producing a sum of £1,348.00 gross, which the respondent was ordered to pay. The claimant was required to account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of the payment. The hearing previously listed on 15 March 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 determination following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. Damages awarded for 4 weeks' notice (gross weekly wage of £337.00 x 4). | Upheld | — | £1,348 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,348
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.