Case 2306333/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mc Potgieter v Solmatrix Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306333/2023
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- South London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mc Potgieter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mc Potgieter, brought a complaint of breach of contract against Solmatrix Ltd. At the hearing on 19 March 2024, before Employment Judge Martin, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr R Bartlett, a director of the respondent company.
The Tribunal did not determine the merits of the complaint. Instead, when the Tribunal indicated there may be jurisdictional issues to consider and after the claimant became aware of the potential value of his claim, he decided to withdraw the complaint. The judge gave him the opportunity to adjourn, but he confirmed that he wished to withdraw it.
The judgment therefore records that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract was dismissed upon withdrawal. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant withdrew the breach of contract complaint after the Tribunal indicated there may be jurisdictional issues to consider and after the claimant became aware of the potential value of the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.