Case 2306334/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Athaide v Aspire Home Carers Limited in voluntary liquidation and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306334/2023
- Decision date
- 20 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs A Athaide
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs A Athaide, succeeded in her complaint of unlawful deduction of wages against the second respondent, Aspire Home Carers (Ramsgate) Limited. Employment Judge Corrigan found the complaint well founded and ordered the second respondent to pay £2,641.86, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. The judgment identifies the award as wages due for the period 7 October 2023 to 8 November 2023.
The tribunal broke the award down into £1,923.08 for October wages, £681.81 for November wages, and £36.97 for holiday pay apportionment relating to that same period. No other claims or remedies are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim was against the second respondent only. The tribunal ordered payment subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. The award comprised wages due for 7 October 2023 to 8 November 2023, made up of £1,923.08 for October, £681.81 for November, and £36.97 holiday pay apportionment. | Upheld | — | £2,642 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,642
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.