Case 2306338/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Harith Taha v Novatek Europe Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306338/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Harith Taha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the liability hearing heard by video at Croydon on 13 and 14 November 2024, Employment Judge Fowell found that Mr Harith Taha was unfairly dismissed and that the dismissal was in breach of contract. The judgment records those liability findings in the written judgment dated 14 November 2024.
The claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, and no merits finding was made on those complaints. The judgment is liability only and states that compensation or any other remedy would be dealt with at a further hearing on 3 December 2024 at 10:00 am.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.