Case 2306351/2020 · Employment Tribunal
S Carter v Chislet Church Of England Primary School Kent County Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306351/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Carter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out S Carter's claim against Chislet Church of England Primary School and Kent County Council. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By a letter dated 14 July 2025, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Andrews ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the pleaded issues or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive pleaded claims. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 14 July 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.