Case 2306353/2020 · Employment Tribunal
D Rawlings v Chislet Church Of England Primary School Kent County Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306353/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Rawlings
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 July 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim, any liability issues, or any monetary remedy. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Andrews on 11 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the claim because, by letter dated 14 July 2025, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient written representations and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.