Case 2306363/2020 · Employment Tribunal
T Perry v Margate, Holy Trinity And St John's Church Of England Primary School Kent County Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306363/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
T Perry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that, by a letter dated 8 July 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The judgment therefore struck out the claim and did not make findings on the substantive merits or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The one-page judgment states only that the claim is struck out because it has not been actively pursued; the substantive sex discrimination classification is taken from the listing context. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The one-page judgment states only that the claim is struck out because it has not been actively pursued; the substantive wages classification is taken from the listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The one-page judgment states only that the claim is struck out because it has not been actively pursued; the substantive working time classification is taken from the listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.