Case 2306416/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Nadia Ishak v Mr J Gionleka — 2024
- Case reference
- 2306416/2023
- Decision date
- 20 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Nadia Ishak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response within the 28-day deadline. Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment on liability under the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the claimant succeeds in the claims brought under this case number by operation of Rule 21. The extracted text does not set out separate merits findings for the individual heads of claim.
Remedy was not determined in this judgment. The decision records that remedy will be dealt with at the next hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Religion or belief | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.