Mrs H Hyde v Check-Mait Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2306418/2023
Decision date: 24 June 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge T Perry Date

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs H Hyde

Respondent

Check-Mait Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time after the claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 22 November 2023. Employment Judge T Perry decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.

The Tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of GBP 2,500. The judgment also states that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claim in respect of the loan.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of GBP 2,500.	Upheld	—	£2,500
Other	The judgment states the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claim in respect of the loan.	Dismissed	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,500; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.