Case 2306421/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Cheryl Woodruffe v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 2306421/2025
- Decision date
- 28 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eoin Fowell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Cheryl Woodruffe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Cheryl Woodruffe brought a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in respect of overtime pay. The matter was heard at Croydon by video on 28 April 2026 before Employment Judge Eoin Fowell.
The tribunal struck out the complaint on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment records the reason as there being no legal entitlement to the overtime payments in question. No monetary remedy or award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint concerned alleged unlawful deduction from wages in respect of overtime pay and was struck out because the tribunal found no reasonable prospect of success, there being no legal entitlement to the payments in question. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.