Case 2306512/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Towers (C1) Miss P Milton (C2) AND v Care Match UK Elite Staffing Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306512/2024
- Decision date
- 2 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Da Costa
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss A Towers (C1) Miss P Milton (C2) AND
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered consolidated claims by Miss Towers and Miss Milton against Care Match UK Elite Staffing Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. R1 did not attend. R2 accepted that R1 was insolvent but disputed that the claimants were employees. C2 had withdrawn her redundancy payment claim at a preliminary hearing on 8 January 2025 and did not pursue notice pay, leaving her final live claim as holiday pay.
Applying the employee-status authorities, including the Ready Mixed Concrete 'irreducible core' of personal service, mutuality of obligation and control, the tribunal found that both claimants worked under contracts of employment within s.230 ERA 1996. It relied on the written terms, which referred to employment, minimum hours, absence reporting, notice, uniforms, benefits and holiday pay, together with the payslips and oral evidence. The tribunal found that the claimants were required to provide their personal services to R1's clients on R1's behalf, were paid through PAYE, were subject to R1's line management, and were controlled by R1 rather than the client sites.
On remedy, the tribunal held that Miss Towers was entitled to a redundancy payment of £942 gross under s.166 ERA 1996. It also found that she was owed £471 gross for one week's statutory notice pay and £393.24 gross for 5.4 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay, making a further s.182/s.184 award of £864.24 gross. Miss Milton was awarded £1,713.73 gross for accrued holiday pay, representing 149.72 hours or 4.16 weeks at 36 hours per week, which the tribunal accepted had not in fact been paid. The combined monetary award recorded by the judgment is £3,519.97 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Gross redundancy payment under s.166 ERA 1996; the tribunal calculated this as two weeks' pay under s.168(1)(a) and s.162(1) and (2)(b). | Upheld | — | £942 |
| Other | Gross s.182/s.184 debt for Miss Towers, comprising £471 for one week's statutory notice pay and £393.24 for 5.4 days' accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £864 |
| Redundancy | Miss Milton withdrew her redundancy payment claim at the preliminary hearing on 8 January 2025 after accepting that she did not have two years' continuous service; the judgment records it as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Gross accrued holiday pay for Miss Milton; the tribunal accepted that 149.72 hours, equivalent to 4.16 weeks at 36 hours per week, had not in fact been paid. | Upheld | — | £1,714 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,520
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
10 references- Ready Mixed Concrete (irreducible core)
- personal service, mutuality of obligation, control
- s.230 ERA 1996
- s.166 ERA 1996
- s.182 ERA 1996
- s.184 ERA 1996
- s.86 ERA 1996
- Staffordshire Sentinel v Potter
- Carmichael v National Power
- Secretary of State for Justice v Windle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.