Case 2306530/2020 · Employment Tribunal
C Rossister v Ellington Infants (comm) Kent County Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306530/2020
- Decision date
- 23 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Rossister
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that, by letter dated 28 May 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The respondent is identified as Ellington Infants (comm) Kent County Council, and the decision was approved by Employment Judge Andrews on 23 September 2025.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, or did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy findings are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not provide sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 28 May 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.