Case 2306558/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss W O Enyi v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306558/2023
- Decision date
- 17 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss W O Enyi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 06 October 2025, to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal considered that a fair hearing was no longer possible because the claim had not been actively pursued and the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 05 June 2025.
The claimant did not make comprehensible written representations as to why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. The judgment records that this was despite Employment Judge Wright having warned the claimant that her communications had been difficult to interpret. The listed hearing from 09 March 2027 to 12 March 2027 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it states only that the claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.