Case 2306581/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Nazma Ali Patricia Fetherston Molly Gorrell Barnes Maria Greenslade Colin Lawton Sara Musselwhite Paula Ward v St Anthony’s School — 2026
- Case reference
- 2306581/2020
- Decision date
- 4 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nazma Ali Patricia Fetherston Molly Gorrell Barnes Maria Greenslade Colin Lawton Sara Musselwhite Paula Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim brought by Nazma Ali, Patricia Fetherston, Molly Gorrell Barnes, Maria Greenslade, Colin Lawton, Sara Musselwhite and Paula Ward against St Anthony's School. Applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, it had considered striking out the claim because it appeared not to have been actively pursued.
On 18 February 2026, the Tribunal wrote to GMB, the claimants' representative, warning of the proposed strike-out. The letter offered an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. No reply was received, so Employment Judge Andrews struck out the claim on 4 July 2026. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. The claim was struck out after it appeared not to have been actively pursued and the Tribunal's warning received no reply. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.