Case 2306587/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Swanson v Lotties Coffee Shop Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306587/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss J Swanson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment deals only with case management as to the second respondent, Mr Dennis McIntosh. By letter dated 19 February 2025, the Tribunal gave Miss J Swanson an opportunity to object to the proposal to strike out the claim against him.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not be made, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim against the second respondent was struck out.
The Tribunal stated that the claimant's claim against the first respondent, Lotties Coffee Shop Ltd, continues. No substantive findings or monetary award are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim against the second respondent, Dennis McIntosh, only. It does not identify the substantive claim type in this short decision. The reason given was that, after a letter dated 19 February 2025 giving the claimant an opportunity to object, the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.