Case 2306599/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Joseph Sheerin v Mokarabia Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306599/2024
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Neill Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Joseph Sheerin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent under Rule 62 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024, issued by Employment Judge O'Neill following a CVP hearing at London South on 21 July 2025. The Tribunal recorded that the Claimant's claims for statutory redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, and outstanding wages succeeded as brought in the claim form.
The parties having agreed terms of settlement, the Tribunal dismissed all such claims on the basis of those agreed terms. The schedule annexed to the judgment records that the Respondent agreed to pay, and the Claimant agreed to accept, the sum of £12,618.07 in full and final settlement of the Tribunal claims and any related employment claims, save for excepted claims relating to personal/industrial injury, pension rights and enforcement of the agreement.
Payment was to be made in two instalments: an initial £4,500 by 22 July 2025 and a final £8,118.07 within seven days of the Settlement Agreement. Marco Zanetti, a director of the Respondent, personally guaranteed the Settlement Payment in the event of default. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will only be provided on request within the statutory window. The gov.uk listing referenced an unfair dismissal category, but the judgment text itself does not adjudicate an unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment by consent under Rule 62. Claim recorded as succeeding; dismissed upon parties agreeing settlement terms. Settlement sum not apportioned per claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. Judgment by consent under Rule 62; succeeded then dismissed upon settlement. Award not split per claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent under Rule 62; succeeded then dismissed upon settlement. Award not split per claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Outstanding wages claim. Judgment by consent under Rule 62; succeeded then dismissed upon settlement. Award not split per claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | Judgment by consent under Rule 62. Claim recorded as succeeding; dismissed upon parties agreeing settlement terms. Settlement sum not apportioned per claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. Judgment by consent under Rule 62; succeeded then dismissed upon settlement. Award not split per claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent under Rule 62; succeeded then dismissed upon settlement. Award not split per claim. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,618
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 62 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.