Case 2306747/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Zarzycka v Third November Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2306747/2025
- Decision date
- 23 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Zarzycka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Robinson, sitting alone at London South by video on 23 January 2026, heard the claim of Miss P Zarzycka against Third November Limited. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent did not attend. The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages by failing to pay the full amounts due for March and April 2025, calculated from earnings of £143 in March 2025 and £830.28 in April 2025, against £700 paid in instalments between June and October 2025. The Respondent was ordered to pay £273.28 gross, being the total sum deducted.
At the hearing the Judge had also awarded £544.90 gross (equivalent to two weeks' pay) on the understanding that the Claimant was complaining of a failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The Claimant subsequently clarified that her complaint was about a failure to provide payslips. The Tribunal recorded that it does not have the power to award compensation for that breach.
Accordingly, the Tribunal made a declaration that the Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with itemised pay statements between March and April 2025, but made no monetary award in respect of that matter.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent ordered to pay £273.28 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages for March and April 2025. | Upheld | — | £273 |
| Other | Declaration only that the Respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements between March and April 2025; Tribunal stated it had no power to award compensation for failure to provide payslips, so no monetary award was made. An earlier oral award of £544.90 was made on a misunderstanding (treating the claim as one for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars) and was not part of the final judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent ordered to pay £273.28 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages for March and April 2025. | Upheld | — | £273 |
| Other | Declaration only that the Respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements between March and April 2025; Tribunal stated it had no power to award compensation for failure to provide payslips, so no monetary award was made. An earlier oral award of £544.90 was made on a misunderstanding (treating the claim as one for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars) and was not part of the final judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £273
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.