Case 2306910/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Y Buckley v Stocks Green Primary School Kent County Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306910/2020
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Y Buckley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 May 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment, and the underlying claim types are not identified in the text provided. The order was approved by Employment Judge Andrews on 2 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action. It is a strike-out order made because the claim had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's letter of 28 May 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.