Case 2307062/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Issac Antwi Bonsu v Dynasty Care Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2307062/2025
- Decision date
- 23 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Issac Antwi Bonsu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Tsamados, sitting alone at London South by CVP on 23 January 2026, heard the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages. The respondent had entered no response and did not attend the hearing. The claimant was represented by counsel.
The tribunal found the complaint well-founded. It awarded the claimant his unpaid wages for December 2024 of £3,126 gross and for January 2025 of £1,404 gross. It also awarded £1,872 gross in respect of 19.5 days of accrued but untaken annual leave for the 2023/24 leave year (calculated at 8 hours per day at £12 per hour), covering the period from 1 April 2024 to the end of his employment on 10 March 2025.
The total award of compensation was £6,402 gross. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Payment for 19.5 days accrued but untaken annual leave for leave year 2023/24, at 8 hours per day, £12 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,872 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award covers unpaid wages for December 2024 (£3,126 gross) and January 2025 (£1,404 gross). | Upheld | — | £4,530 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award covers unpaid wages for December 2024 (£3,126 gross) and January 2025 (£1,404 gross). | Upheld | — | £4,530 |
| Holiday pay | Payment for 19.5 days accrued but untaken annual leave for leave year 2023/24, at 8 hours per day, £12 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,872 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,402
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.