Case 2307077/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Azzolin v Convivia Construction Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2307077/2023
- Decision date
- 2 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 11 December 2023 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No liability issues were contested in a response, and the tribunal proceeded to determine the pleaded monetary claims on the material before it.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for August 2023 and 10 days of September 2023. It ordered payment of £6,666 gross for that head of claim. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of one month's notice pay and awarded £5,000 gross damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of 5 days at £227 per day, and ordered £1,135 gross. The total award was therefore £12,801 gross. The judgment also records that the claimant must account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of any payment received pursuant to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for August 2023 and 10 days of September 2023 and ordered payment of £6,666 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,666 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of one month's notice pay and awarded £5,000 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement of 5 days at £227 per day and ordered £1,135 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,801
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.