Case 2307089/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Knights Brown Construction Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2307089/2023
- Decision date
- 12 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn December 2023 the claimant presented claims of unfair dismissal and unpaid holiday pay. A hearing was listed for 30 and 31 October 2024, and case management orders were sent to both parties on 16 February 2024. The tribunal later recorded that the claimant did not comply with those orders. On 2 April 2024 the tribunal ordered the claimant to confirm whether he still wished to pursue the claim, explain why he had not complied, and state when he would be able to do so; no reply was received.
After further correspondence, including a tribunal letter of 22 May 2024 asking the claimant to confirm whether he had any additional documents and to supply them if so, there was still no reply. On 12 September 2024 the tribunal again wrote to the claimant requiring him to confirm within seven days whether he was pursuing the case and warning that strike out would be considered if he did not reply. The claimant did not respond to that letter. The respondent then asked for the claim to be struck out on 26 September 2024, and the claimant later said he had not received correspondence and asked the respondent to provide it that day.
The respondent renewed its application for strike out and for the hearing to be postponed. On 30 October 2024 the respondent indicated it was willing and able to attend, but the claimant did not attend and the hearing was vacated. Employment Judge Andrews held that the claimant had failed to comply with the February 2024 orders and had subsequently failed more than once to provide information by the specified deadlines. The tribunal concluded that the claim had not been properly and actively pursued and struck it out because a fair hearing of the issues could not be conducted at the listed hearing date.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out for failure to comply with tribunal orders and for not being properly and actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Struck out for failure to comply with tribunal orders and for not being properly and actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.