Case 2307119/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Jaques v Mrs Hazal Naylor Silverski Holidays — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307119/2020
- Decision date
- 7 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Jaques
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Reed proceeded to determine the claim on the papers. The judgment records only a redundancy payment claim and does not refer to any other substantive liability issues.
The tribunal found that Mrs A Jaques was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment calculated using a gross weekly wage of £488.15, age 55, and 15 years of service with the respondent at the date of dismissal. The amount awarded was £10,739.30 gross.
The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £10,739.30 in total. It also records that the claimant is responsible for any sums owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment calculated on a gross weekly wage of £488.15, age 55, and 15 years' service. | Upheld | — | £10,739 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,739
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.