Case 2307228/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mark Edwards v Sowga Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307228/2020
- Decision date
- 25 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Apted Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mark Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South Employment Tribunal on 25 October 2021, before Employment Judge Apted, the claimant Mark Edwards appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written judgment records only that the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay was withdrawn and dismissed, and that the claimant’s claim for redundancy pay was withdrawn and dismissed.
No substantive findings on liability, compensation, or statutory calculation are set out in the written record. The notes state that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. On the face of the written judgment, there was no monetary award and no further determination recorded beyond the withdrawal and dismissal of the two claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for redundancy pay was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.