Case 2307229/2020 · Employment Tribunal
P Hall v Tax Logic Limited t/a TaxAssist Accountants — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307229/2020
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
P Hall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 14 September 2021 before Employment Judge L Burge, the Tribunal refused the Claimant's application for a postponement. The Claimant did not attend, and the Respondent was represented by Ms Linford, Counsel.
The Claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of annual leave was dismissed. The Tribunal also found that the Claimant's redundancy payment claim was well founded, but recorded that the redundancy payment had already been paid, so no award was due.
The Tribunal further held that no compensation was payable to the Claimant for financial loss attributable to the late payment of the redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of annual leave. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The redundancy payment claim was found well founded, but the Tribunal recorded that it had already been paid, so no award was due. The Tribunal also held that no compensation was payable for financial loss attributable to the late payment of the redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.