Case 2307328/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Nita v Art Refurbishment Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307328/2020
- Decision date
- 21 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Atkins JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Nita
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Atkins at London South (Croydon) by CVP on 21 March 2022. The Tribunal recorded that it had emailed the claimant on 14 March 2022 giving notice of the hearing and had written to the respondent on the same date giving notice of the hearing.
Neither party attended the hearing. The Tribunal said it had considered all the information available and made all practicable enquiries, but concluded that no satisfactory reasons were given by either party for their absence. It therefore ordered that the claim be dismissed pursuant to Rule 47.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive heads of claim in the reasons. The Tribunal dismissed the claim pursuant to Rule 47 after neither party attended the hearing on 21 March 2022 and no satisfactory reasons for absence were given. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.