Miss E Wicks v Jbe Skincare Ltd — 2025

Case reference: 2307341/2024
Decision date: 1 May 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Khalil Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss E Wicks

Respondent

Jbe Skincare Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by a letter dated 31 March 2025, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment was approved by Regional Employment Judge Khalil Date on 1 May 2025.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying legal claim type. It states that by a letter dated 31 March 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, so the claim was struck out.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.