Case 2307383/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Marley v Travel Republic Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307383/2020
- Decision date
- 8 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington Appearances
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Marley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr W Marley brought a single claim against Travel Republic Limited for unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment records that the case was heard remotely on 8 November 2021 before Employment Judge Harrington, with Mr Marley appearing in person and Miss S Clarke, Counsel, appearing for the respondent.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim was not well founded. It therefore dismissed the claim in full. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No further findings of fact or legal analysis are set out in the written judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.