Case 2307384/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M King v Kings College NHS Foundation Trust RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 2307384/2024
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rakhim Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 9 July 2025 before Employment Judge Rakhim, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's discrimination claims against Kings College NHS Foundation Trust. The claim of discrimination on grounds of age, race and religion or belief was found not to have been presented within the applicable time limit.
The tribunal held that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. Those discrimination claims were therefore struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the merits of those claims.
The claimant withdrew the claims of sex discrimination, redundancy and other payments. The judgment records those withdrawn claims as dismissed. No remedy was awarded in the record of this preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Part of a grouped discrimination claim listed as age, race and religion or belief; struck out as out of time and the tribunal declined to extend time as just and equitable. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Part of the grouped discrimination claim listed with age and religion or belief; struck out as out of time. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Part of the grouped discrimination claim listed with age and race; struck out as out of time. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Sex discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant; the judgment records the claim as dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Redundancy | Withdrawn by the claimant; the judgment records the claim as dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Described in the judgment as 'other payments'; withdrawn by the claimant and recorded as dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.