Case 2307451/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms X Marcos-Rodriguez v Mrs S Pillow (deceased) Trading as Green Bank Registered Residential Care Home — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307451/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms X Marcos-Rodriguez
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 27 July 2021, the Tribunal gave Ms X Marcos-Rodriguez an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not attended the hearing and the case had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment does not make any merits findings on the listed heads of claim and does not record any monetary award. The hearing fixed for 24 March 2022 was vacated and would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.