Case 2307474/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Burton v Didge.io Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307474/2020
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Burton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Andrews recorded that a determination could properly be made on that basis. The judgment states that Didge.io Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) made unauthorised deductions from Mr J Burton's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Burton £2,166.00 gross. The judgment also records that Mr Burton is responsible for any amounts owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions. The total sum payable under the judgment was £2,166.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,166.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,166 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,166
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.