Case 2307487/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Grubb v Wolf IND Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2307487/2023
- Decision date
- 11 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Grubb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dyal, sitting at London South by videolink, determined two money claims brought by Mr I Grubb against Wolf IND Ltd. The tribunal held that the respondent was in breach of contract because it failed to pay £2,700 in notice pay.
The tribunal also held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages in three respects: £364.67 for August and September 2023, £300 in respect of uniform and keys, and £966 in respect of accrued holiday pay on termination. Those sums were awarded together with the notice pay, producing a total award of £4,330.67.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay £2,700 by way of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,700 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages totaling £1,630.67, made up of £364.67 for August and September 2023, £300 for uniform and keys, and £966 for accrued holiday pay on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,631 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,331
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.