Claimant v Medicines Online Ltd and Mr P J Brennan — 2026

The claimant had obtained a Rule 22 judgment for unpaid wages in the sum of £2,669.80 gross. On reconsideration, the Tribunal confirmed that judgment but corrected it so that the only respondent liable was Medicines Online Limited, which all parties agreed had employed the claimant.

The claimant's application for reconsideration also sought to address unpaid holiday pay and harassment matters. The Tribunal found that the holiday pay complaint had not been articulated in the claim form beyond a ticked box, and that the pleaded harassment narrative did not amount to a harassment complaint related to a protected characteristic within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The Tribunal refused the claimant's reconsideration application, except for the correction removing Mr P J Brennan as a respondent to the wages judgment.