Case 2307521/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Miss E Khorozyan v Brent Property Limited — 2017

Case reference: 2307521/2023
Decision date: 2 November 2017
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Siddall

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss E Khorozyan

Respondent

Brent Property Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment because no response had been received from Brent Property Limited. The tribunal decided that Miss E Khorozyan's age discrimination claim, notice pay claim, and unpaid wages claim succeeded. The judgment does not set out further factual reasoning in the extracted text.

The tribunal also dealt with an unfair dismissal claim. It directed the claimant to write within 21 days to show good reason why that claim should not be struck out, because she had less than two years' service. The extracted judgment therefore does not record a final determination of the unfair dismissal claim in this document.

A remedy hearing was to be listed to consider compensation. No award figures are set out in the extracted text provided.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	Age discrimination claim succeeded in the Rule 21 judgment after no response was received from the respondent.	Upheld	Age	—
Breach of contract	Notice pay claim succeeded.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Unpaid wages claim succeeded.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.