Case 2307553/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Ryan v Royal Arsenal Medical Centre — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307553/2020
- Decision date
- 1 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Ryan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat with Employment Judge D Wright alone on 31 March and 1 April 2022. The respondent had applied to strike out the claim for failure to serve witness statements in compliance with case management directions, but that application was refused on being withdrawn.
The substantive issue decided was whether Mr K Ryan had been dismissed by Royal Arsenal Medical Centre within the meaning of section 95(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found that he had not been dismissed within that meaning.
For that reason, the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent within the meaning of section 95(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 95(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.