Case 2307702/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Bulica v Limelight Sports Limited (in Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2307702/2023
- Decision date
- 6 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Bulica
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms Bulica, brought claims arising from the termination of her employment with Limelight Sports Limited (in Administration). The tribunal sat at London South by CVP on 5 February 2025 before Employment Judge Hart, and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found the redundancy pay complaint well-founded, but recorded that no further award was due because the claimant had already received statutory redundancy pay from the Redundancy Payment Service.
The tribunal also found the notice pay complaint well-founded. It found that the claimant was entitled to 4 weeks' statutory notice, that she had already been paid 1 week, and that the respondent should pay the remaining 3 weeks' notice. The judgment quantified that balance at £816 net and ordered that sum as damages for breach of contract.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions for non-payment of wages between 1 and 6 November 2023 was also found well-founded. No award was made on that complaint because the tribunal recorded that the amount owed had already been paid by the Administrators. The only monetary award recorded in the judgment was £816 net for the notice pay claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The complaint for redundancy pay following termination of the claimant's contract on 6 November 2023 was found well-founded, but no award was made because she had already received statutory redundancy pay from the Redundancy Payment Service. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay complaint was found well-founded. The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 4 weeks' statutory notice, had been paid 1 week's notice, and ordered the respondent to pay the remaining 3 weeks' notice of £816 net as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £816 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions due to non-payment of wages between 1 and 6 November 2023 was found well-founded, but no award was made because the amount owed had already been paid by the Administrators. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £816
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.