Case 2307704/2020 · Employment Tribunal

In Person For the v Mr Murray, Owner — 2021

Case reference: 2307704/2020
Decision date: 30 November 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Balogun Date

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

In Person For the

Respondent

Mr Murray, Owner

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a judgment on preliminary issue in James Cartwright v Juniper Hill Ltd, heard by Employment Judge Balogun at London South on 30 November 2021. The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim and the claim for a statutory redundancy payment were dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant did not have 2 years' continuous service with the respondent.

The tribunal also dismissed all other claims. The extracted judgment does not identify those remaining claims individually, so they are recorded here as an unspecified residual dismissal rather than inferred into particular causes of action. No monetary award was made.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant did not have 2 years' continuous service with the respondent.	Dismissed	—	—
Redundancy	The claim for a statutory redundancy payment was dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the same basis.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed, but it does not identify those claims individually in the extracted text.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.