Case 2307715/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Mojumdar v Hello Spice UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2307715/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Mojumdar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Mojumdar, attended the hearing in person with a Bengali interpreter. The respondent, Hello Spice UK Ltd, did not attend. The tribunal accepted that he had worked as a waiter from 28 October 2019 to 20 September 2020, that he worked at least 35 hours per week, and that his agreed rate was £8.72 per hour, equivalent to £305.20 gross per week.
On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence about what had been paid and what remained outstanding, including the weekly shortfalls and the additional hours worked on 20 September 2020. It also accepted that the payslips did not correspond to the amounts actually paid. Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and noting that the respondent had not suggested any contractual right or other agreement authorising deductions, the tribunal upheld the unlawful deductions from wages claim and awarded £4,037.59 gross.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that under Regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998 the claimant had accrued 5.03 weeks' holiday over the period worked. It accepted his evidence that he had worked bank holidays and taken no other leave, and the respondent provided no detail of holiday taken or sums paid on termination. Under Regulation 14, the tribunal awarded £1,535.16 gross for untaken holiday pay.
The notice pay claim failed. The tribunal held that under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the claimant was entitled to one week's notice, but he had resigned without giving notice, so the respondent was not in breach of contract. The total award was £5,572.75 gross of tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages under section 13 ERA 1996. Tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence of hours worked, hourly rate, and non-payment of the identified wage periods. | Upheld | — | £4,038 |
| Holiday pay | Claim under Regulations 13, 13A and 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Tribunal found 5.03 weeks accrued holiday on the employment dates and no evidence of leave taken or holiday paid on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,535 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim failed because the claimant accepted he resigned without giving notice, so the respondent was not in breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,573
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulations 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.