Case 2307719/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wilson v WLS Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2307719/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Abbott at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 20 October 2021, with Mr J Wilson appearing in person and WLS Limited represented by Ms G Nicholls of counsel. The judgment records only the tribunal's orders on the respondent's strike-out applications.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal and also struck out the complaint of breach of contract. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text for either claim.
The respondent's applications to strike out the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages were refused. The text provided does not record any final merits determination of that complaint, so only the procedural outcome can be extracted from this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent's applications to strike out this complaint were refused; no final merits determination is recorded in the text provided. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.