Case 2307723/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bellinfantie v Helm Enterprise Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2307723/2020
- Decision date
- 18 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bellinfantie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 October 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr P Bellinfantie an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with an Order of the Tribunal. On 14 October 2022 the Tribunal also invited the respondent's comments on whether the claimant had engaged in preparations for the Final Hearing, which was then listed to begin on 17 October 2022; the respondent replied the same day that he had not.
The Tribunal then indicated by further letter on 14 October 2022 that the claim would be struck out for failure actively to pursue it. The claimant emailed later that day asking for consideration of what he planned to say in a separate email, but no separate email was received and there was no further correspondence from the claimant after 14 October 2022.
In light of that position, Employment Judge Abbott concluded that it remained appropriate to strike out the claim for failure on the part of the claimant to actively pursue it, and the claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(d) for failure actively to pursue it, following non-compliance with an Order of the Tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.